Why we are not anti antifa; Why we are anti-anti antifa

 

S. Artesian

Here’s why, in a nutshell:

As President Donald Trump was holding a press conference attacking the “alt-left” as equally culpable for the violence and hatred in Charlottesville, West told his Dartmouth class he was standing with 20 clergy members and social justice activists singing This Little Light of Mine while nine military-style units of white nationalists marched past them shouting and cursing in their faces.

“We would have been crushed like cockroaches if it were not for the anarchists and anti-fascists,” West said.

What the so-called Marxists, “responsible leftists,”  academic and non-academic socialists miss, besides everything, in their denunciations of antifa is precisely that– that there are fascists organizing demonstrations as a cover in order to physically assault, injure, terrorize black people, brown people, workers organizing for a better wage or better working conditions, and  women, and anybody else who might stand in their way.

While the so-called Marxists, the “responsible leftists,” academic and non-academic socialists point to the massive demonstration against white supremacy in Boston as the “go to” template for defeating the nazis, the so-called Marxists, “responsible leftists,” academic and non-academic socialists not only miss, but work to  obscure and sequester the real point: that Boston would never have occurred if it were not for the courage of those who demonstrated alongside antifa in Charlottesville;  those who confronted the nazis in Charlottesville; those who defended Cornell West and the clergy members.

Boston never would have happened without those who battled alongside antifa; San Francisco, where the nazis decided not to show up,  would never have happened.  Berkeley, where the nazis did show up and were thoroughly routed, would not have happened without antifa in Charlottesville, without those who marched alongside antifa.

We are not anti antifa, because antifa would have stopped the beating of special education teacher De’Andre Harris at the hands of the nazis, while the Charlottesville police stood by and did nothing, which is precisely what the police do, being separated from nazis by less than a single degree.

Is this really news?  Did IQs just drop sharply, as Ripley put it in Aliens? Did everyone suddenly forget Sheriff Jim Clark of Dallas County, Alabama, recruiting a posse of the Ku Klux Klan members to attack SNCC workers attempting to register African-American voters?  Right, it was 50 years ago, or was it?  Maybe it was yesterday.  It sure as hell is going to be tomorrow.

Did everyone forget Bull Connor, allowing the KKK to assault civil-rights workers in Birmingham?

Did everyone just fall off a truckload of pumpkins, being brought to market from Amnesiaville?

Is antifa in and of itself the program for social revolution?  Of course not. Since when has that ever been the question to ask?  Since when has that ever been the determining criteria for support, no-support?

Is antifa sufficient?  Of course not.  Is it essential? Of course it is.

Those who raise that issue, demanding complete programmatic elaboration before deigning to offer support raise that demand as nothing less than misdirection.  Does anyone think the International Socialists represents in and of itself the program for social revolution?  Those in the organization might, but that is a measure of their isolation, their loss of reality, thinking that an organization can represent the complete struggle of a class for emancipation, when the class itself has not yet initiated the struggle for its self-emancipation.

Does anyone think that the Internationalist Perspective, a grouplet whose musings are the ideological equivalent of an obsessive-compulsive continuously washing his/her hands in order to get out, out that damn spot of real class struggle, real history, has anything that amounts to a program for revolution?

Of course not.  There is no complete program for revolution, and there will not be one that develops separate and apart from the concrete struggles that antifa itself has mobilized to engage.

It is imperative that we move towards that program, and we can only do that by assessing the victories, however small, and the defeats, however large, and preparing ourselves for the obvious and forthcoming change in tactics, and strategies, of the fascists.  We do that only by assessing tactics, changing tactics, elaborating strategies, articulating the outlines of programs for the class as a whole to grasp, engage, alter, and most importantly, supersede.

So the nazis absorbed several defeats in Boston and the Bay Area.  The nazis expected that.  They know that they have a friend in the White House; they know they have friends in state houses; they know they have friends in the houses of Congress;  they know they have friends in the state legislatures. They know, most of all, they have friends in every police department, in every law enforcement body in the United States, from the attorney-general to the county sheriff.

The nazis know a thing or two about terror; after all their normalizer-in-chief is a landlord, a real estate “developer” and nothing gets done in that business, the capitalization of property, without terrorism, without wrecking peoples’ lives; without throwing people into the street and running them over.

The nazis will adjust accordingly.  They will wage terror campaigns relying heavily on operating from a distance and as individuals or small groups, “fire teams” they will call them getting a vicarious thrill from the military nomenclature like they do from their military camouflage gear, and their military assault rifles.

Some will target specific individuals who have been identified as antifa either through the nazis’ own networks, or through their access to those of the law enforcement agencies.

Some will target individuals and groups indiscriminately.

They, the nazis, all are in love with the notion of being “shooters”– Charles Whitman being first forever in their pantheon of heroes, but unlike Whitman, these nazis are not “simple psychotics,” they’re ambulatory.  They think they have a purpose.  And the purpose is to pass among us unseen, unnoticed, until, like cicadas, they can emerge in a swarm.

So while we prepare to protect our flanks, and our tail ends, from those with Dodge Challengers; while we can, will, and must mobilize thousands against the nazis, and around programs calling for disbanding all government bodies engaged in voter suppression; dismantling the ICE and CBP in their entirety; eliminating all right-to-work laws, and all laws interfering with women’s access to free, safe health care, we need to prepare to meet the next, and next style, of attacks.

August 28, 2017

Advertisements

1 thought on “Why we are not anti antifa; Why we are anti-anti antifa”

  1. Open Letter to Antifa International on Receipt of a Donation

    On Saturday, August 19, 2017 10:14 AM, John A Imani wrote:

    Comrades of Antifa International,

    You are more than welcome for the small donations I have made. However I must tell you that my support for your organization and your movement is based upon the principle of ‘critical support’. I support you in your efforts to match and even turn back the increasingly dangerous and vicious right-wing. A right-wing that is becoming more defiant in in the expression of its views. A right-wing becoming more dangerous in its ability to injure and kill. A right-wing that is armed and increasingly becoming adept at street-fighting through martial trainings.

    In response to the upswing in number, intensity and threat level of an increasingly armed right wing there has appeared, on the left, those groups such as yourselves, taking a militant position in opposition to this scourge. I do not claim to have any great insight into this particular element of our movement, Antifa, but I can speak in general about the question of a physical and even an armed opposition to racism: it is necessary and it is needed.

    There are threats now of 1, 2, many Grensboros–where 5 good communists were shot down by those who could be marching today alongside and with these 21st Century racists and there would be no difference of distinction between them. And they are armed to the teeth.

    Imagine if it had of been leftists toting AR15s (as the Nazis did) at Charlottesville.  It would have been a bloodbath, helicopter gunships the whole fkn gamut.  We cannot and ought not seek to intimidate as those right-wingers do.  And not just because the state would act with haste and fury. 

    In the ’60s the major mistake that we in the movement made was the turn to and embrace of militarism.  This provided a convenient rationale for the state to repress as the toll of Panthers and others murdered attests.  There is another reason, even a more important reason, and that is that we are not what either the Nazis nor the police/army complex are: instruments for the suppression of the masses. 

    We are for the liberation of the masses from, in this case exactly so, armed and physical subjugation and hence we ought not adapt such a posture.  BUT WE MUST BE ABLE TO DEFEND OURSELVES.  The racists were lynching black people since 1619  and did so for 350 years and only stopped that shit when the Deacons and Robert Williams and the Republic of New Africa and the BPP took up arms.  Not to intimidate but to stop being intimidated.  Not for force projection but for force-protection.  We got away from that when we reified vilence and elevated it from a tactic to a strategy to, almost, a goal.

    It is with no hyperbole to say that if we are to survive and thrive as a movement to change the disastrous course of this socio-politico-economic system it is necessary that we have the means of self-defense. But the organs and means of self-defense must be a part of and not separate from this movement as a whole. It must be in the control of and not be controlling of our movement as a whole. It must be a means of defense and not a means-in-itself. And its goals and tactics must be in concert with those of our movement as a whole. This movement, our movement, our methods and our goal, is to abolish violence and the ways and manners we comport ourselves must be in harmony with goals we hold such as this.

    I will continue to support with funds as I am able. I know that they are being used to assist those who fight for us. Recently your group, Antif Int’l, gave over 700$ to a comrade of mine after he was arrested at a pro-Trump rally here in LA. And it is for actions like that that I urge financial support and, at the same time, critical support of your efforts.

    (Antif Int’l is based in Canada and donations are made in Canadian dollars which is about 80cents to a dollar so a 20$ CAD donation is about 16$ US. https://intlantifadefence.wordpress.com/donate/ )

    JAI

    On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 8:29 AM, Antifa Intl wrote:

    Hi John,

    You’re probably feeling as shook up with recent events as we are.  We are heartened that your recent donation comes alongside dozens of others we’ve received this week.  The struggle is real and we need to have each others’ backs now more than ever!  Thank you as always.

    In Solidarity,

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s